Let’s face it: social media isn’t easy. We’ve touched on the difficulty of PR measurement, and truly understanding the effectiveness of social media efforts is an equally—if not more—daunting task.
We all want to know how a program moves the needle with our target audiences, be it increased brand awareness, revenue, customer satisfaction, and so on. But the inherent challenges of social media channels won’t always provide these insights, let alone surface an in-depth understanding of who we’re socializing with. As a result, instead of trying to always hit the bull’s eye, sometimes it’s about getting close.
Do You Really Know Who Your Social Audience Is?
We often think so, but how much do we really know? Twitter, for example, can identify originating IP addresses to see where, geographically, a follower is. But unless a user has a profile full of personal background, there’s no way of knowing things such as gender, marital status, education, occupation, etc. for a deeper sense of who we’re engaging with. We’re left making assumptions, and audience becomes a little fuzzy.
Facebook, on the other hand, can provide more insight into user demographics thanks to more comprehensive profiles– if made public. With increased privacy controls users are more encouraged to participate online, but it’s also more difficult to see “who” specifically is engaging. Because personal information isn’t always visible, an accurate and comprehensive view of audience and their actions can be elusive.
Beyond the Like: Gauging Content’s Broader Impact
Fortunately we at least have ways to monitor how an audience interacts with content, shedding light on the effectiveness of efforts. Tracking the number of Likes, ReTweets, Pins and comments on owned social properties will provide a pretty good idea of what content is hitting the mark. However, that’s not the whole story.
For example, take an industry article in Forbes touting a product or service as “best in class.” Posted on owned social media properties, it’s easy to gauge audience interaction. But readers can also “like” that article directly on Forbes.com, which needs to be accounted for to gauge it’s full impact. And how about forums, where the article might be mentioned within a post on a related topic?
In other words, there’s no single report or source of measurement; you have to gather information from multiple sources to get a complete picture.The time consuming and often manual process still won’t provide a precise accounting, but can develop a general sense of effectiveness.
Reaching Out
In addition to knowing audience and the effectiveness of content in creating interaction, social media measurement is incomplete without an understanding of reach. If a particular piece of content doesn’t drive high levels of engagement but reaches a lot of people, it still serves a purpose.
Revisiting the Forbes article, the greater the reach—regardless of engagement or interaction—the more people are exposed to the positive endorsement. It’s an important factor to take into account and may help drive content strategy. Are you seeking greater engagement? Greater reach? Both? Is a piece of content with above-average engagement and reach of 500 more effective than content with average interaction but a reach of 10,000? The answer depends on goals, but regardless it’s something to be thinking about.
In Closing…
Truth be told, this won’t make social media measurement much easier or more straightforward, but recalibrating how we think of measuring effectiveness can provide a better understanding of social media impact.